| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
03/09/2019 |
|
Actualizado : |
28/04/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
RABAZA, A.; BANCHERO, G.; CAJARVILLE,C.; ZUNINO, P.; BRITO, A.; REPETTO, J.; FRAGA, M. |
|
Afiliación : |
ANA VIRGINIA RABAZA MARTINEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CECILIA CAJARVILLE, Departamento de Nutrición Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, San José, Uruguay; PABLO ZUNINO, MEC/ IIBCE (Instituto de Investigaciones de Ciencias Biológicas "Clemente Estable"), Montevideo, Uruguay.; Departamento de Nutriciion Animal, Instituto de Produccion Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Ruta 1 km 42.5, San José 80100, Uruguay.; JOSE LUIS REPETTO CAPELLO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay.//Departamento de Bovinos, Instituto de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Ruta 1 km 42, CP 80100 San José, Uruguay.; MARTIN FRAGA COTELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Effects of feed withdrawal duration on animal behaviour, rumen microbiota and blood chemistry in feedlot cattle: implications for rumen acidosis. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal, Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 66 - 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119001538 |
|
DOI : |
10.1017/S1751731119001538 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 22 October 2018 // Accepted 13 June 2019. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstracts: Feed withdrawal ( FW ) is a frequent issue in open outdoor feedlot systems, where unexpected circumstances can limit the animals? access to food. The relationship among fasting period, animal behaviour during feed reintroduction ( FR ) and acidosis occurrence has not been completely elucidated. Twenty steers fitted with rumen catheters were fed a high-concentrate diet (concentrate : forage ratio 85 : 15) and were challenged by a protocol of FW followed by FR. The animals were randomly assigned to one of the four treatments: FW for 12 h ( T12 ), 24 h ( T24 ), 36 h ( T36 ) or no FW (control group) followed by FR. The steers? behaviour, ruminal chemistry, structure of the ruminal microbial community, blood enzymes and metabolites and ruminal acidosis status were assessed. Animal behaviour was affected by the FW?FR challenge (P<0.05). Steers from the T12, T24 and T36 treatments showed a higher ingestion rate and a lower frequency of rumination. Although all animals were suspected to have sub-acute ruminal acidosis ( SARA ) prior to treatment, a severe case of transient SARA arose after FR in the T12, T24 and T36 groups. The ruminal pH remained below the threshold adopted for SARA diagnosis (pH value=5.6) for more than three consecutive hours (24, 7 and 19 h in the T12, T24 and T36 treatments, respectively). The FW?FR challenge did not induce clinical acute ruminal acidosis even though steers from the T36 treatment presented ruminal pH values that were consistent with this metabolic disorder (pH threshold for acute acidosis=5.2). Total mixed ration reintroduction after the withdrawal period reactivated ruminal fermentation as reflected by changes in the fermentation end-products. Ruminal lactic acid accumulation in steers from the T24 and T36 treatments probably led to the reduction of pH in these groups. Both the FW and the FR phases may have altered the structure of the ruminal microbiota community. Whereas fibrolytic bacterial groups decreased relative abundance in the restricted animals, both lactic acid producer and utiliser bacterial groups increased (P<0.05). The results demonstrated a synchronisation between Streptococcus (lactate producer) and Megasphaera (lactate utiliser), as the relative abundance of both groups increased, suggesting that bacterial resilience may be central for preventing the onset of metabolic disturbances such as ruminal acidosis. A long-FW period (36 h) produced rumen pH reductions well below and lactic acid concentration increased well above the accepted thresholds for acute acidosis without any perceptible clinical signs. MenosAbstracts: Feed withdrawal ( FW ) is a frequent issue in open outdoor feedlot systems, where unexpected circumstances can limit the animals? access to food. The relationship among fasting period, animal behaviour during feed reintroduction ( FR ) and acidosis occurrence has not been completely elucidated. Twenty steers fitted with rumen catheters were fed a high-concentrate diet (concentrate : forage ratio 85 : 15) and were challenged by a protocol of FW followed by FR. The animals were randomly assigned to one of the four treatments: FW for 12 h ( T12 ), 24 h ( T24 ), 36 h ( T36 ) or no FW (control group) followed by FR. The steers? behaviour, ruminal chemistry, structure of the ruminal microbial community, blood enzymes and metabolites and ruminal acidosis status were assessed. Animal behaviour was affected by the FW?FR challenge (P<0.05). Steers from the T12, T24 and T36 treatments showed a higher ingestion rate and a lower frequency of rumination. Although all animals were suspected to have sub-acute ruminal acidosis ( SARA ) prior to treatment, a severe case of transient SARA arose after FR in the T12, T24 and T36 groups. The ruminal pH remained below the threshold adopted for SARA diagnosis (pH value=5.6) for more than three consecutive hours (24, 7 and 19 h in the T12, T24 and T36 treatments, respectively). The FW?FR challenge did not induce clinical acute ruminal acidosis even though steers from the T36 treatment presented ruminal pH values that were consistent with ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ACIDOSIS RUMINAL; ENGORDE DE BOVINOS; FATTENING; FOOD RESTRICTION; LIVESTOCK; PLATAFORMA DE SALUD ANIMAL; RESTRICCIÓN NUTRICIONAL; RUMINAL ENVIRONMENT; SUB-ACUTE RUMINAL ACIDOSIS. |
|
Thesagro : |
COMPORTAMIENTO ANIMAL; GANADO BOVINO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L02 Alimentación animal |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03782naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1060132
005 2021-04-28
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1017/S1751731119001538$2DOI
100 1 $aRABAZA, A.
245 $aEffects of feed withdrawal duration on animal behaviour, rumen microbiota and blood chemistry in feedlot cattle$bimplications for rumen acidosis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aArticle history: Received 22 October 2018 // Accepted 13 June 2019.
520 $aAbstracts: Feed withdrawal ( FW ) is a frequent issue in open outdoor feedlot systems, where unexpected circumstances can limit the animals? access to food. The relationship among fasting period, animal behaviour during feed reintroduction ( FR ) and acidosis occurrence has not been completely elucidated. Twenty steers fitted with rumen catheters were fed a high-concentrate diet (concentrate : forage ratio 85 : 15) and were challenged by a protocol of FW followed by FR. The animals were randomly assigned to one of the four treatments: FW for 12 h ( T12 ), 24 h ( T24 ), 36 h ( T36 ) or no FW (control group) followed by FR. The steers? behaviour, ruminal chemistry, structure of the ruminal microbial community, blood enzymes and metabolites and ruminal acidosis status were assessed. Animal behaviour was affected by the FW?FR challenge (P<0.05). Steers from the T12, T24 and T36 treatments showed a higher ingestion rate and a lower frequency of rumination. Although all animals were suspected to have sub-acute ruminal acidosis ( SARA ) prior to treatment, a severe case of transient SARA arose after FR in the T12, T24 and T36 groups. The ruminal pH remained below the threshold adopted for SARA diagnosis (pH value=5.6) for more than three consecutive hours (24, 7 and 19 h in the T12, T24 and T36 treatments, respectively). The FW?FR challenge did not induce clinical acute ruminal acidosis even though steers from the T36 treatment presented ruminal pH values that were consistent with this metabolic disorder (pH threshold for acute acidosis=5.2). Total mixed ration reintroduction after the withdrawal period reactivated ruminal fermentation as reflected by changes in the fermentation end-products. Ruminal lactic acid accumulation in steers from the T24 and T36 treatments probably led to the reduction of pH in these groups. Both the FW and the FR phases may have altered the structure of the ruminal microbiota community. Whereas fibrolytic bacterial groups decreased relative abundance in the restricted animals, both lactic acid producer and utiliser bacterial groups increased (P<0.05). The results demonstrated a synchronisation between Streptococcus (lactate producer) and Megasphaera (lactate utiliser), as the relative abundance of both groups increased, suggesting that bacterial resilience may be central for preventing the onset of metabolic disturbances such as ruminal acidosis. A long-FW period (36 h) produced rumen pH reductions well below and lactic acid concentration increased well above the accepted thresholds for acute acidosis without any perceptible clinical signs.
650 $aCOMPORTAMIENTO ANIMAL
650 $aGANADO BOVINO
653 $aACIDOSIS RUMINAL
653 $aENGORDE DE BOVINOS
653 $aFATTENING
653 $aFOOD RESTRICTION
653 $aLIVESTOCK
653 $aPLATAFORMA DE SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aRESTRICCIÓN NUTRICIONAL
653 $aRUMINAL ENVIRONMENT
653 $aSUB-ACUTE RUMINAL ACIDOSIS
700 1 $aBANCHERO, G.
700 1 $aCAJARVILLE,C.
700 1 $aZUNINO, P.
700 1 $aBRITO, A.
700 1 $aREPETTO, J.
700 1 $aFRAGA, M.
773 $tAnimal, Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 66 - 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119001538
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
20/05/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/05/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
SESSIM, A. G.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; PEREIRA, G. R.; CASTILHO, E. M.; BARCELLOS, J. O. J. |
|
Afiliación : |
AMIR GIL SESSIM, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GABRIEL RIBAS PEREIRA, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; EDUARDO MADEIRA CASTILHO, Federal University of Pelotas, UFPEL, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Pelotas, Brazil; JÚLIO OTÁVIO JARDIM BARCELLOS, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888 |
|
ISSN : |
2007-1124; e-ISSN: 2448-6698 |
|
DOI : |
10.22319/RMCP.V13I1.5888 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022.
Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:amirsessim@hotmail.com -- This study was supported by the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project CNPq No. 133454/2014-2) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). Licencia: licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization.
© 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization.
© 2022 INIFAP-CENI... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Animal production; Economy; Gross revenue; Integration; PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL; Production cost. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/download/5888/4707
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03152naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1063153
005 2022-05-20
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2007-1124; e-ISSN: 2448-6698
024 7 $a10.22319/RMCP.V13I1.5888$2DOI
100 1 $aSESSIM, A. G.
245 $aFinancial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022. Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:amirsessim@hotmail.com -- This study was supported by the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project CNPq No. 133454/2014-2) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). Licencia: licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
520 $aABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization. © 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved.
653 $aAnimal production
653 $aEconomy
653 $aGross revenue
653 $aIntegration
653 $aPLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL
653 $aProduction cost
700 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, G. R.
700 1 $aCASTILHO, E. M.
700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J. O. J.
773 $tRevista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
